Open-source AI Trading OS, agent trading, and vibe trading, with Jev System One integration. Research, build Python strategies, backtest, and paper/live trade across crypto, stocks, and forex. Launch your own multi-tenant trading SaaS with built-in user management, billing, payments, and settlement.
jev-cyrillic-audit
Does TypeSafe's Jev keep its accuracy and calibration on Russian? Independent RU vs EN audit (ECE, reliability diagrams, paired bootstrap) on parallel human-labelled data.
Project facts
- Relationship to Jev
- Jev application
- Evidence
- Documented
- Language
- Python
- License
- MIT
- Origin
- Original repository
- Repository status
- Not archived
- Created
- 2026-09-20
- GitHub stars
- 0
- Evidence checked
- 2026-09-24T12:45:35.000Z
- Metadata checked
- 2026-09-24T12:45:35.000Z
- Check status
- current
Stars measure the whole repository, including work unrelated to Jev.
Evidence and scope
Documented records the linked documentation or source. JevHunt has not independently run or benchmarked this project.
> **Verdict (jev-1.13.0, n=600 paired items per dataset, pre-registered):** on XNLI, Jev is **measurably worse and less calibrated in Russian** — accuracy 88.3% → 77.3% (paired Δ = -11.0 pp, 95% CI [-14.2, -7.8]) and ECE 0.032 → 0.096 (Δ = +0.063 [+0.033, +0.088]); on MASSIVE intent classification there is **no detectable difference at n=600** — accuracy 86.7% vs 85.2% (Δ = -1.5 pp [-3.5, +0.2]), ECE 0.066 vs 0.071 (Δ = +0.005 [-0.011, +0.026]).
Evidence commit: 6ff6de22f662d1ee310dde9d5b2efbce1376aeb6
Discovered through: github-search.
How we review →